Can India develop and produce indigenous aircraft ejection seats?

India has conducted successful rocket-sled testing of an ejection system but remains fully dependent on imported Martin-Baker and Russian seats for operational aircraft.

Aircraft ejection seat
India's statusEmerging since 2026
Criticalitycritical
Import dependence100% of operational ejection seats imported; India operates Martin-Baker (UK) and Zvezda K-36 (Russia) variants only (2026)
Global makers2
United States · United Kingdom · Russia
Typehardware
SectorDefence & Weapons
Rests on9 capabilities
Deep-red gaps2
VerificationMachine-checked
Revised2026-07-15

1The gap

Every one of the 1,013 Martin-Baker ejection seats in service with the Indian Air Force and Navy is imported. India is Martin-Baker's second-largest customer worldwide, yet as of 2026 it makes not a single operational fighter ejection seat of its own.

The ejection seat is one of the hardest small systems in military aviation. In under two seconds it must fire a pyrotechnic sequence, sever or jettison the canopy, boost the seat clear of the airframe with a solid rocket motor, deploy a drogue and main parachute, and restrain a pilot's limbs against extreme deceleration — all while keeping a human being alive. Only the United States, the United Kingdom and Russia field certified combat seats at scale. Martin-Baker alone holds 54% of the global market.

India's position is emerging. On 2 December 2025, DRDO conducted a high-speed rocket-sled test of an indigenous fighter escape system at the Rail Track Rocket Sled facility at the Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory in Chandigarh, operational since 2014 and capable of supersonic testing. The test validated canopy severance, ejection sequencing and complete aircrew recovery. TBRL has also tested a design that could be adapted for the Jaguar. Meanwhile the imported supply continues: Martin-Baker is delivering 108 IN16G seats for 83 Tejas Mk1A fighters — 40% delivered by February 2025, final deliveries due by 2028 — and announced a Bengaluru manufacturing and maintenance facility at Aero India 2025.

The gap persists for two structural reasons. The first is certification. Moving from a successful sled test to a combat-proven seat requires several years of biomechanical modelling, iterative human-in-the-loop trials, qualification testing and international certification — and each aircraft type needs its own structural integration certification. The second is dependence itself. IAF Jaguars now face a shortage because Martin-Baker has stopped producing several MK-9 components. And imported seats carry foreign export controls: Argentina's interest in the Tejas was blocked because the UK, under its post-Falklands embargo on Buenos Aires, would not release the Martin-Baker seats fitted to the aircraft. Substituting the Russian Zvezda K-36 to circumvent that embargo would require reworking cockpit structure, canopy, avionics cabling and safety logic — with fresh analysis and in-flight testing for each change.

2Tech tree

read left to right · click any card for its record

3The builders

Stage = IndiaBUILD assessment from evidence
01
Assessed · Limited production claims: limited production
02
Assessed · Prototype claims: —
03
Assessed · Study claims: —

4What it would take

The IAF has now invited private companies to lead indigenous development, citing cost, supply chains and geopolitical vulnerability. Most enabling capabilities — cartridges, rocket motors, parachutes, the test range — are already domestic. What remains is the long, unglamorous climb through human-rated certification.

The Swarajya View
The argument behind this record — in Swarajya.

The diagnosis is free. The argument, the politics, and the case — in Swarajya.

Read on Swarajya →